I continue to be amazed at the (non)coverage at cnn.com of relevant factual information. Case in point, the headline reads:

Ex-agent: Waterboarding ’saved lives’

“John Kiriakou said he did not want to perform the “entirely unpleasant” procedure branded by critics as torture, but added it brought results that stopped attacks and saved lives.”

IF you click the story, you get the MORE IMPORTANT DATA:

“A former CIA agent who participated in interrogations of terror suspects said Tuesday that the controversial interrogation technique of “waterboarding” has saved lives, but he considers the method torture and now opposes its use.”

Hello? On the home page you get “branded by critics as torture” and then IF you read the story which many people don’t you get “he considers the method torture and now opposes its use.”

Hmmm.

And oh, by the way, there’s a teensy weensy little story about the destruction of evidence tied directly to this story. Any mention of this at CNN? Nope.

Hmmm.